Pharmacological prevention and treatment of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related pain often requires opioid treatment with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) as its most frequent gastrointestinal side-effect. Both for prevention and treatment of OIC osmotic (e.g. polyethylene glycol) and stimulant (e.g. bisacodyl) laxatives are widely used. Newer drugs such as the peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) and naloxone in a fixed combination with oxycodone have become available for the management of OIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to give an overview of the scientific evidence on pharmacological strategies for the prevention and treatment of OIC in cancer patients. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was completed from inception up to 22 October 2022. Randomized and non-randomized studies were systematically selected. Bowel function and adverse drug events were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty trials (prevention: five RCTs and three cohort studies; treatment: ten RCTs and two comparative cohort studies) were included in the review. Regarding the prevention of OIC, three RCTs compared laxatives with other laxatives, finding no clear differences in effectivity of the laxatives used. One cohort study showed a significant benefit of magnesium oxide compared with no laxative. One RCT found a significant benefit for the PAMORA naldemedine compared with magnesium oxide. Preventive use of oxycodone/naloxone did not show a significant difference in two out of three other studies compared to oxycodone or fentanyl. A meta-analysis was not possible. Regarding the treatment of OIC, two RCTs compared laxatives, of which one RCT found that polyethylene glycol was significantly more effective than sennosides. Seven studies compared an opioid antagonist (naloxone, methylnaltrexone or naldemedine) with placebo and three studies compared different dosages of opioid antagonists. These studies with opioid antagonists were used for the meta-analysis. Oxycodone/naloxone showed a significant improvement in Bowel Function Index compared to oxycodone with laxatives (MD -13.68; 95 % CI -18.38 to -8.98; I2 = 58 %). Adverse drug event rates were similar amongst both groups, except for nausea in favour of oxycodone/naloxone (RR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.31-0.83; I2 = 0 %). Naldemedine (NAL) and methylnaltrexone (MNTX) demonstrated significantly higher response rates compared to placebo (NAL: RR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.64-2.61, I2 = 0 %; MNTX: RR 3.83, 95 % CI 2.81-5.22, I2 = 0 %). With regard to adverse events, abdominal pain was more present in treatment with methylnaltrexone and diarrhea was significantly more present in treatment with naldemedine. Different dosages of methylnaltrexone were not significantly different with regard to both efficacy and adverse drug event rates. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium oxide and naldemedine are most likely effective for prevention of OIC in cancer patients. Naloxone in a fixed combination with oxycodone, naldemedine and methylnaltrexone effectively treat OIC in cancer patients with acceptable adverse events. However, their effect has not been compared to standard (osmotic and stimulant) laxatives. More studies comparing standard laxatives with each other and with opioid antagonists are necessary before recommendations for clinical practice can be made.

Adverse drug reactions attributed to generic substitution of antiretroviral medications among HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis clients in British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: In British Columbia, antiretrovirals (ARVs) for HIV treatment (HIV-Tx) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are free-of-charge through publicly-funded Drug Treatment Programs (DTPs). When available, less costly generics are substituted for brand-name ARVs. We describe the incidence and type of product substitution issue (PSI) adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to generic ARVs. METHODS: Cohorts included DTP clients ≥19 years who received generic ARVs for HIV-Tx (abacavir-lamivudine, emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, atazanavir or darunavir between 01 Jun 2017 and 30 Jun 2022) or PrEP (emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, 01 Apr 2018 to 30 Jun 2022). Demographic, ARV and ADR data were extracted from DTP databases and summarized by descriptive statistics. PSI incidence was calculated for each product during the year following brand-to-generic and generic-to-generic transitions (first-year-post-rollout), and compared between generic versions using generalized estimating equations. For context, incidence of any ARV product-related ADR was calculated in the same 1-year periods. RESULTS: During first-year-post-rollout periods, 5339 HIV-Tx (83% male, median age 52 years) and 8095 PrEP (99% male, median 33 years) clients received generic ARVs, and reported 78 and 23 generic PSIs, respectively. PSI incidence was <1% for most generic ARVs, with mild-moderate symptoms including gastrointestinal upset, headache, dizziness, fatigue/malaise and skin rash. In HIV-Tx clients, the efavirenz-containing product had higher PSI incidence than other ARVs (2.2%, p = .004), due to more neuropsychiatric adverse reactions. Any ADR incidence was stable across measurement periods, and generic PSIs represented less than one third of all product-related ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Generic substitution of antiretrovirals for HIV-Tx and PrEP was well tolerated, with ≤2% incidence of mild-moderate PSI ADRs.

Achilles' Heel of currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: immune related adverse events.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the cancer treatment landscape by opening up novel avenues for intervention. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has exponentially increased, so have immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The mechanism of irAEs may involve the direct damage caused by monoclonal antibodies and a sequence of immune responses triggered by T cell activation. Common side effects include dermatologic toxicity, endocrine toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and hepatic toxicity. While relatively rare, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity can be fatal. These toxicities pose a clinical dilemma regarding treatment discontinuation since they can result in severe complications and necessitate frequent hospitalization. Vigilant monitoring of irAEs is vital in clinical practice, and the principal therapeutic strategy entails the administration of oral or intravenous glucocorticoids (GSCs). It may be necessary to temporarily or permanently discontinue the use of ICIs in severe cases. Given that irAEs can impact multiple organs and require diverse treatment approaches, the involvement of a multidisciplinary team of experts is imperative. This review aims to comprehensively examine the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, incidence, and treatment options for various irAEs.

Cytomegalovirus Occurrence and Time-to-onset Analysis Under Bendamustine With Anti-CD20 Antibodies Using the JADER Database.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients with malignant lymphoma, in a latent state of weakened immune function, are at risk of chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Concomitant therapy with bendamustine and rituximab or obinutuzumab intensifies immunosuppression, potentially affecting CMV onset. This study aimed to assess CMV onset differences between bendamustine monotherapy and combination therapy with rituximab or obinutuzumab using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A JADER analysis dataset (April 2004 to September 2022) defined CMV infection using 31 preferred term (PT) words from MedDRA 25.1J HLT "Cytomegalovirus infection (10011827)". Reporting odds ratios (ROR) calculated CMV infection signals for bendamustine monotherapy, rituximab, obinutuzumab, bendamustine+rituximab (BR), and bendamustine+obinutuzumab (GB). ROR confidence intervals exceeding 1 indicated a CMV signal. Days of CMV infection were calculated based on adverse event onset and administration start. RESULTS: CMV signals were confirmed for monotherapy and combination therapies. CMV infection durations (median, interquartile range) were 41.0 days (23.5-69.5) for bendamustine monotherapy, 63.5 days (35.2-95.0) for BR, and 61.0 days (33.0-102.5) for GB, with cases exceeding 200 days. CONCLUSION: JADER analysis detected significant CMV signals for rituximab, obinutuzumab, and bendamustine. Caution may be warranted 7-9 months post-bendamustine administration, necessitating further investigation, including cell-mediated immunity suppression assessment.

Thalidomide for management of refractory oral mucosal diseases.

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide has anti-inflammatory properties and has been used off-label for multiple mucocutaneous disorders, but its application in managing refractory oral mucosal diseases is unclear. This study aimed to review the efficacy and safety of thalidomide in treating various oral mucosal disorders refractory to conventional therapies. METHODS: The medical records of patients who were prescribed thalidomide from 2002 through 2021 for oral mucosal disorders were reviewed. Data collected included demographic characteristics, oral mucosal disease diagnosis, treatment courses, and thalidomide dose, duration, response, and side effects. RESULTS: Thalidomide was prescribed for 28 patients with diagnoses of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (n = 14), inflammatory oral lichenoid lesions (n = 6), traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stroma eosinophilia (n = 5), chronic radiation-induced mucositis (n = 2), and orofacial granulomatosis (n = 1). Patients were treated for a median duration of 84 days (range 2-1,582). Clinical improvement was observed in 19 of 22 patients who completed at least 1 cycle of thalidomide (86.4%), with complete resolution in 12 patients (54.5%). Adverse events occurred in 75% of patients (n = 21), with 8 requiring thalidomide discontinuation. The most common adverse events included peripheral neuropathy (42.9%), drowsiness (28.6%), and constipation (21.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Thalidomide may be considered for the management of refractory oral mucosal disorders. Drug side effects are common and need monitoring closely during use.

A prospective observational study of estimating drug related problems and clinical outcomes in subtypes of stroke patients.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a neurological disease and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Strokes mainly consist of two types: hemorrhage and ischemia. Stroke patients are being administered multiple drug therapy and are at risk of drug-related problems. AIM: To estimate drug-related problems (DRPs) and clinical end outcomes in hospitalized stroke patients. METHODS: Current study was a multicenter, cross-sectional prospective observational study including 250 stroke patients admitted to tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. The study included all clinical subtypes of stroke patients i.e. Stroke, Ischemic stroke, Hemorrhagic stroke, CVA, and TIA. Associations among patient-clinical end outcomes and drug therapy-related variables like DRPs, mortality, and morbidity rates were estimated using Pearson's chi-squared test. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS software, version 25. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients participated in this study suffering from different clinical subtypes of stroke i.e. Ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, TIA, and CVA, including 46% male and 54% female patients. The majority of patients' stay at the hospital was between 1-10 days. The overall mortality rate in stroke patients was 51%. HAIs were observed in 70% of patients, HAIs faced by patients were SAP, CAP, UTI, sepsis, and VAP. Drugs were assessed according to NEML i.e. access group antibiotics, watch group antibiotics, reserve group antibiotics, statins, antiepileptics, and proton pump inhibitors. Majorly ceftriaxone was administered to 79% of patients, piperacillin-tazobactam to 52%, and cefixime to 48%, whereas meropenem was administered to 42% of patients along with vancomycin to 39% of total patients. A high mortality rate was observed in the case of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus i.e. 78% and in the case of streptococcus pneumoniae 61% mortality rate was observed. Due to the presence of DRPs and various other clinical factors like comorbidities, DDIs, HAIs, administration of potentially nephrotoxic drugs, and administration of antibiotics without having CST, hospitalized stroke patients faced many problems. CONCLUSION: This study helped determine DRPs along with various clinical factors affecting the clinical end outcomes of patients suffering from any clinical subtype of stroke. Due to the enhancement in the evidence of the incidence of DRPs in tertiary care hospitals, pharmacist-led drug therapy review by interfering with doctors and other medical professionals at the patient bed site is needed and should be done to avoid any negative end outcomes and serious issues related to DRPs.

Drug-induced atrial fibrillation. A narrative review of a forgotten adverse effect.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. There is clinical evidence that an increasing number of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs, mainly anticancer drugs, can induce AF either in patients with or without pre-existing cardiac disorders, but drug-induced AF (DIAF) has not received the attention that it might deserve. In many cases DIAF is asymptomatic and paroxysmal and patients recover sinus rhythm spontaneously, but sometimes, DIAF persists, and it is necessary to perform a cardioversion. Furthermore, DIAF is not mentioned in clinical guidelines on the treatment of AF. The risk of DIAF increases in elderly and in patients treated with polypharmacy and with risk factors and comorbidities that commonly coexist with AF. This is the case of cancer patients. Under these circumstances ascribing causality of DIAF to a given drug often represents a clinical challenge. We review the incidence, the pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, clinical relevance, and treatment of DIAF. Because of the limited information presently available, further research is needed to obtain a deeper insight into DIAF. Meanwhile, it is important that clinicians are aware of the problem that DIAF represents, recognize which drugs may cause DIAF, and consider the possibility that a drug may be responsible for a new-onset AF episode.

Implementation of a tier system for IVIG indications to address IVIG shortage at a tertiary care pediatric medical center.

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages are a common issue that healthcare systems face and can result in adverse health outcomes for patients requiring inferior alternate treatment. The United States recently experienced a national drug shortage of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Several reported strategies to address the IVIG and other drug shortages have been proposed; however, there is a lack of evidence-based methods for protocol development and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of introducing a multidisciplinary task force and tier system of indications and to minimize adverse effects during a shortage of IVIG. METHODS: Faculty members across disciplines with expertise in IVIG use were invited to participate in a task force to address the shortage and ensure adequate supply for emergent indications. A tier system of IVIG indications was established according to the severity of diagnosis, urgency of indication, and quality of supporting evidence. Based on inventory, indications in selected tiers were auto-approved. Orders that could not be automatically approved were escalated for task force review. RESULTS: Overall, there were 342 distinct requests for IVIG during the study period (August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019). All Tier 1 indications were approved. Of all requests, only 2.6% (9) of requests were denied, none of which resulted in adverse effects based on retrospective chart review. Seven patients who regularly receive IVIG had possible adverse effects due to dose reduction or spacing of treatment; however, each complication was multifactorial and not attributed to the shortage or tier system implementation alone. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary task force and tier system to appropriately triage high-priority indications for limited pharmaceutical agents should be considered in health institutions faced with a drug shortage.

Implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing prior to allopurinol initiation in Malaysian primary care setting: A qualitative study from doctors' and patients' perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Allopurinol, the first-line treatment for chronic gout, is a common causative drug for severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR). HLA-B*58:01 allele was strongly associated with allopurinol-induced SCAR in Asian countries such as Taiwan, Japan, Thailand and Malaysia. HLA-B*58:01 screening before allopurinol initiation is conditionally recommended in the Southeast-Asian population, but the uptake of this screening is slow in primary care settings, including Malaysia. This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of primary care doctors and patients with gout on implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing in Malaysia as part of a more extensive study exploring the feasibility of implementing it routinely. METHODS: This qualitative study used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to obtain information from patients with gout under follow-up in primary care and doctors who cared for them. Patients and doctors shared their gout management experiences and views on implementing HLA-B*58:01 screening in primary care. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: 18 patients and 18 doctors from three different healthcare settings (university hospital, public health clinics, private general practitioner clinics) participated. The acceptability to HLA-B*58:01 screening was good among the doctors and patients. We discovered inadequate disclosure of severe side effects of allopurinol by doctors due to concerns about medication refusal by patients, which could potentially be improved by introducing HLA-B*58:01 testing. Barriers to implementation included out-of-pocket costs for patients, the cost-effectiveness of this implementation, lack of established alternative treatment pathway besides allopurinol, counselling burden and concern about genetic data security. Our participants preferred targeted screening for high-risk populations instead of universal screening. CONCLUSION: Implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing in primary care is potentially feasible if a cost-effective, targeted screening policy on high-risk groups can be developed. A clear treatment pathway for patients who test positive should be made available.

Dynamics of overdose and non-overdose mortality among people living with HIV amidst the illicit drug toxicity crisis in British Columbia.

We sought to characterize overdose and non-overdose mortality among PLWH amidst the illicit drug toxicity crisis in British Columbia, Canada. A population-based analysis of PLWH (age ≥19) in British Columbia accessing healthcare from April 1996 to March 2017 was conducted using data from the Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS (STOP HIV/AIDS) cohort linkage. Underlying causes of deaths were stratified into overdose and non-overdose causes. We compared (bivariate analysis) health-related characteristics and prescription history between PLWH died of overdose and non-overdose causes between April 2009 and March 2017. Among 9,180 PLWH, we observed 962 deaths (142 [14.7%] overdoses; 820 [85.2%] other causes). Compared to those who died from other causes, those who died of overdose were significantly younger (median age [Q, Q3]: 46 years [42, 52] vs. 54 years [48, 63]); had an indication of chronic pain (35.9% vs. 27.1%) and hepatitis C virus (64.8% vs. 50.4%), but fewer experienced hospitalization in the year before death. PLWH who died were most likely to be prescribed with opioids (>50%) and least likely with opioid agonist therapy (<10%) in a year before death. These findings highlight the syndemic of substance use, HCV, and chronic pain, and how the crisis is unqiuely impacting females and younger people.

Effectiveness and safety of mono- and add-on perampanel in pediatric patients with epilepsy: Experience from a single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of perampanel (PER) monotherapy (MT) or add-on therapy (AT) in Chinese children with epilepsy, as well as to evaluate the data from routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PER for these pediatric patients. METHODS: This retrospective and observational study was carried out on children with epilepsy (n = 340) from 2020 to 2022 at the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Outcome measures were the responder rate (50% or greater seizure reduction), long-term efficacy, and tolerability (number and types of adverse events) in MT and AT groups. Concentrations of plasma PER obtained from these patients, if available, were analyzed too. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients achieved at least 3 months of therapy, and 58.1% responded to PER therapy. 53 of the responders were seizure-free (32.7%). The retention rate dropped from 88.0% at 3 months to 40.6% at 12 months after treatment. Patients with MT achieved better seizure control than those with AT (P < 0.001). Intriguingly, PER exerted a very weak effect on patients who took more than 2 ASMs or were diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the two groups. In addition, 179 patients were routinely monitored for PER, and the trough concentrations (C0 ) for these patients ranged from 30.0 to 992.0 ng/mL. However, no significant difference in C0 was observed between responders and nonresponders (333 ng/mL vs 325.5 ng/mL, P = 0.264). SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides effectiveness and safety data on Chinese children with epilepsy treated with PER either as MT or as AT. The efficacy of patients receiving MT was much better than cases administered with more than 2 ASMs or diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, no association was found between the plasma PER concentration and efficacy or safety. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The study reports the effects of perampanel on seizures and adverse effects in Chinese patients with epilepsy younger than 18 years. Seizures decreased in 58.1% of patients (responders); in a third of these responders, seizures stopped. After treatment was started, 88% of patients were still on perampanel at 3 months and 40.6% at 12 months. People who were treated with perampanel only were more likely to respond than those who received perampanel and other antiseizure treatments, although perampanel was tolerated equally well in these groups. Plasma perampanel concentration did not predict seizure response or adverse effects.

Normalization and cross-sectional validation of an extended Adverse Event Profile (E AEP) in a large cohort of patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (L AEP) is commonly used in clinical practice and pharmacological trials for the monitoring of side effects of anti-seizure medication (ASM). However potentially unrelated, additional symptoms and normative data should be considered to put patients´ complaints into perspective. METHODS: An extended 32-item AEP (E AEP) was given to 537 healthy subjects and 1,605 patients with epilepsy as part of the Bonn ASM side effect registry. The tool was factor-analyzed, corrected for age, gender, and repeated application, and related to drug load and individual substances (with N> 100) on item and scale level (total E AEP and its subscales cognition, dizziness, energy, mood, bodily symptoms, aggression, and sexuality). RESULTS: Compared to non-normalized results, at item level, between one and two-thirds of responses suggesting impairment were found to be unlikely to be related to ASM treatment after normalization. Binary regression analyses revealed differential effects of medication choice, but also of antidepressants and neuroleptics on complaint domains. The explained variance was better for physical than psychological domains. The results reflect both known drug side effects and indications. Patients´ explicit attribution of problems to their medications barely improved the correlation of the E AEP and treatment parameters. CONCLUSION: Application of a norm-referenced AEP is highly recommended to avoid overestimation of treatment related problems in patients with epilepsy. It allows evaluation on item and scale level for individuals as well as groups in drug trials. Plausible relations to individual drugs and to drug load can be demonstrated. The explanatory power was better for physical than psychological domains. Drug-related complaint patterns reflect known drug side effects (e.g. perampanel and brivaracetam with aggression) as well as drug indications (e.g. lamotrigine for depression). This is likely to be particularly relevant when side effects may have affected treatment decisions. Longitudinal evaluation with repeated application of the E AEP with changes of drug treatment is in progress.

Predictors and associated factors with adverse drug reaction in people with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: There is a need for early identification and intervention of Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) to alleviate the unacceptably growing burden, morbidity, and mortality associated with People With Epilepsy (PWE). This study is aimed at identifying associated factors and predictors of ADR among PWE. METHODS: It is an interviewer-administered questionnaire-based study consisting of 940 consenting participants aged 16 years and above attending epilepsy clinics for 5 years with diagnosis confirmed by International League against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria and supported by Electroencephalography (EEG). Twenty-one-item Liverpool Adverse Effect Profile (LAEP) and 8-item Morinsky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) were used to assess ADR and adherence respectively. RESULTS: The highest reported ADR in PWE were nervousness (34.3%), aggression (33.6%), and weight gain (32.3%). Specifically, 20.1% of the participants complained of memory problems. On the other hand, ADR associated with skin, mouth/gum and hair loss was 9.3%, 8.9%, and 7.2% respectively, and these were the lowest reported ADRs. Using the MMAS, 545(90.2%), 28(4.6%), and 31(5.1%) of PWE in this study were classified as having high, medium, and low adherence, respectively. Duration of Anti-Seizure Medication (ASM) use and duration of epilepsy were the major determinants of ADR in PWE on the regression model. CONCLUSION: Duration of ASM use and duration of epilepsy are the major determinants of ADR in PWE. Effective strategies to identify and reduce ADR should be incorporated into the management of PWE by Health Care Providers (HCPs) to improve their quality of life.

American College of Medical Toxicology and the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology position statement: nalmefene should not replace naloxone as the primary opioid antidote at this time.

BACKGROUND: Nalmefene is a potent opioid antagonist that has recently been reintroduced in the United States to treat known or suspected opioid overdose. NALMEFENE CLINICAL TRIAL DATA: The injection formulation, which had been withdrawn in 2008, was reintroduced in 2022, and in 2023 the United States Food and Drug Administration approved a new intranasal formulation of nalmefene. Because nalmefene had been previously approved for use in 1995 via injection, the new intranasal formulation did not require new clinical data as it was approved under an Abbreviated New Drug Application. Inherent to this abbreviated approval process, intranasal nalmefene was not studied in patients currently suffering opioid overdose. NALOXONE AND NALMEFENE: Nalmefene also has unique characteristics compared with naloxone, the current standard opioid antidote. Nalmefene has a higher affinity for opioid receptors and a longer duration of action than naloxone. Comparative effectiveness data regarding naloxone and nalmefene are sparse, and it is unclear if the inherent properties of nalmefene are beneficial in opioid overdose. We have decades of experience using naloxone safely and effectively as the primary opioid antidote, even in cases of fentanyl and fentanyl analog overdoses. There is, however, evidence to suggest nalmefene may result in more prolonged and severe opioid withdrawal than naloxone, which could be harmful to patients. POSITION: As nalmefene is untested in the current clinical environment of synthetic opioid overdoses and has the potential to cause harm via prolonged withdrawal, it is the opinion of the American College of Medical Toxicology and the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology that nalmefene should not replace naloxone as the primary opioid antidote at this time. RECOMMENDATIONS: We recommend additional clinical studies of nalmefene, administered via all approved routes, be conducted in a comparative fashion with naloxone, and that safety and effectiveness outcomes be evaluated before nalmefene is recommended as a primary opioid antidote.

Adverse drug reactions in children and adolescents on daily antitubercular regimen: An observational longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: Subsequent to introduction of daily fixed dose combination (FDC) regimen with increased dosages and inclusion of ethambutol in continuation phase of antitubercular therapy (ATT) in India, this study was done to evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children and adolescents. METHODS: Longitudinal observational study conducted in tertiary teaching hospital. Children (1 month-18 year), with newly diagnosed drug sensitive tuberculosis, started on daily FDC regimen of ATT, were included. Participants were followed up at 2 weeks, 8 weeks and 6 months. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) severity grading and World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) causality assessment was done. RESULTS: In 99 participants, 29 experienced ADRs. Most commonly ADRs involved hepatobiliary (11.1%) and gastrointestinal (8.1%) systems. Grade 3 severity noted in 35.5% ADRs. Certain causality classified in 19.3%. Presence of ADRs was significantly higher in participants with vs without malnutrition [40.5% vs 21.1% (p = 0.036)]. Tendency for more severe ADRs noted in participants with vs without malnutrition [Grade 3 ADRs out of all ADRs: 64.7% vs 0% (p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: Incidence and severity of ADRs has increased after introduction of daily FDC of ATT. Most common ADR observed were hepatobiliary. Malnutrition and less weight for age were risk factors for occurrence and severity of ADRs.

Pharmacogenetic Approach for the Prevention of Rivaroxaban's ADRs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Pharmacogenetics is a potential approach that can be applied to decline the burden of rivaroxaban's ADRs. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aim to identify genetic variants correlated with rivaroxaban exposure and evaluate their importance. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for all observational and interventional studies. The fixed effect method was used to pool the data when the Q-test's p value was higher than 0.1. We used random models when the p value was less than 0.1. Results: Data from ten studies (4721 participants) were analyzed in the current review. Qualitative synthesis from included studies found that two variants of ABCB1 (rs1045642 and rs2032582) and one variant of APOB (rs13306198) are potential contributors to rivaroxaban concentrations. Both wild homozygotes (AA) and heterozygotes (AC) of rs1045642 have significantly lower rivaroxaban concentrations compared to mutated homozygotes (CC) (SMD = 0.516, 95% CI: 0.115 to 0.917; SMD = 0.772, 95% CI: 0.088 to 1.455, respectively). Nevertheless, pooling unadjusted odds ratios did not yield a statistically significant correlation between rivaroxaban ADRs and genetic mutations. Conclusion: This study revealed that being an AC or CC for rs1045642 is attributed to a considerably higher rivaroxaban level in participants using rivaroxaban. That is to say, rs1045642 is a remarkable predictor of rivaroxaban metabolism. We concluded that identifying rs1045642 before drug administration might decrease ADRs although further studies adjusted for potential confounders are strongly suggested.

Deprescribing: A Prime Opportunity to Optimize Care of Cancer Patients.

Patients with incurable cancers have an increasing number of comorbidities, which can lead to polypharmacy and its associated adverse events (drug-to-drug interaction, prescription of a potentially inappropriate medication, adverse drug event). Deprescribing is a patient-centered process aimed at optimizing patient outcomes by discontinuing medication(s) deemed no longer necessary or potentially inappropriate. Improved patient quality of life, risk reduction of side effects or worse clinical outcomes, and a decrease in healthcare costs are well-documented benefits of deprescribing. Deprescribing and advance care planning both require consideration of patients' values, preferences, and care goals. Here, we provide an overview of comorbidities and associated polypharmacy risks in cancer patients, as well as useful tools and resources for deprescribing in daily practice, and we shed light on how deprescribing can facilitate advance care planning discussions with patients who have advanced cancer or a limited life expectancy.

Lamotrigine use and potential for adverse cardiac effects: A retrospective evaluation in a Veteran population.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of lamotrigine (LTG) on cardiac rhythm and conduction abnormalities for Veterans, an especially vulnerable population. BACKGROUND: In October 2020 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added a new warning to the label of lamotrigine (Lamictal™) regarding its potential to cause cardiac rhythm and conduction abnormalities [1]. This warning came following in vitro data which suggested Class IB antiarrhythmic effects occurring at clinically achievable concentrations of lamotrigine [2]. However, it is unclear whether the in vitro findings will result in adverse clinical outcomes. Our objective was to assess for evidence for adverse clinical outcomes in a vulnerable population and examine for subtler signs of an association between lamotrigine and cardiac rhythm disturbances. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted using records between 10-01-2017 and 07-06-2021, identifying patients at the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital who were prescribed lamotrigine. Data collected included: dates of lamotrigine initiation or discontinuation, lamotrigine dosing over the time of the prescription and maximum lamotrigine dose, any cardiac-related ICD-10-CM codes or a history of a cardiology appointment, EKGs with any abnormalities or changes, any concomitantly prescribed medications with known potential to cause cardiac abnormalities, any cardiac deaths. This retrospective chart review was approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-three (189 male) patients with a lamotrigine prescription and 41.2 % (n = 96) of these patients had an EKG performed while prescribed lamotrigine. The average age of patients was 64.3 ± 13.0 (range 29 to 90) years and mean maximum lamotrigine daily dose was 250.8 ± 148.2 mg (range 25 to 800 mg). Nearly half (47.9 %, 46/96) of the patients were prescribed a concomitant sodium channel blocking medication in addition to lamotrigine. Eighty-four of the patients (87.5 %, 84/96) had a cardiac diagnosis, while 12 (12.5 %, 12/96) did not. A total of 12 deaths occurred within the review period, with two cardiac deaths from congestive heart failure. Four cases did not have information on cause of death. No LTG-associated cardiac adverse effects were noted as part of clinical care, though rash was noted in 5 cases. A total of 7 (7.3 %, 7/96) patients were found to have EKG abnormalities potentially related to lamotrigine, including 7.1 % (6/84) of those with a cardiac diagnosis and 8.3 % (1/12) of those without a cardiac diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: While recent FDA warnings have suggested caution regarding cardiac complications associated with lamotrigine based on in vitro studies, the clinical implications are uncertain. Despite selecting a particularly vulnerable population, this retrospective chart review did not identify any deaths due to cardiac rhythm or conduction causes, nor demonstrate unambiguous cardiac complications related to lamotrigine. Even using permissive criteria (including any prolonged PR or QTc) to examine for subtle effects, only a low incidence (<10 %) of potential complications was found. Broader implications of this study are limited by the number of patients included and the retrospective nature of the study. Therefore, further studies are warranted to evaluate a link between cardiac complications and the use of lamotrigine, including the role of concomitant medications such as other sodium channel blocking agents and psychotropic medications.

Research Progress on Mechanism and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions of Anlotinib.

Anti-angiogenesis therapy plays a vital role in the treatment of tumors, with anlotinib as its representative targeted drug. Anlotinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with inhibitory effects on tumor growth tumor angiogenesis. In Phase III clinical trials, anlotinib demonstrated better overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and was approved for the first time as a third-line treatment for refractory advanced NSCLC. Going far beyond that, anlotinib has shown encouraging results in a variety of malignancies, including medullary thyroid carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, anlotinib has been subject to some controversy in terms of adverse events due to its widespread use. In this review, the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, adverse reactions in clinical use and management of anlotinib were summarized.